Gemini 3.6 Flash and 3.5 Flash-Lite Ignore Temperature, Top-P, and Top-K
Google's Gemini 3.6 Flash and Gemini 3.5 Flash-Lite ignore temperature, top_p, and top_k, according to Google's current migration guide. Existing Gemini requests…
The saying "You are who you surround yourself with" takes on new meaning today. Many of us spend a lot of time talking to AI models like ChatGPT. We ask them questions, share ideas, write emails, and even look for companionship. Even though these models can be personalized, they're all built on similar foundations and trained on similar data.
Just like spending time with human friends shapes how we talk and think, using powerful AI regularly could affect us even more deeply. It's not just about copying writing styles; it's about how we think, argue, and organize our ideas.
We're seeing early signs of this change. Researchers have found increases in words that AI likes to use - words like "pivotal," "showcasing," and "meticulous" are showing up more in academic papers and everyday writing. While changing our style isn't necessarily bad, it shows that we're picking up habits from our AI tools. We put our names on writing that these tools heavily influenced or even created.
Think about what this means for children today. Many kids will soon have AI as a main source of information, a homework helper, and sometimes even a friend. While older generations learned from parents, teachers, friends, books, and real-world experiences, future generations might be heavily influenced by a single digital source. What happens when everyone talks to the same "friend" who thinks in similar ways?
This brings up important questions about the future of how we talk and think as a society:
If we rely more on AI for ideas and expression, are we losing the unique, unusual parts of individual thought? New ideas often come from different perspectives and unexpected connections - things that might get lost if we all think in similar ways.
The people who develop and adjust these AI models make choices that include their own views. Does this give them too much power over public thought? Will future PR or propaganda focus less on convincing people directly and more on influencing how AI works?
As we get used to AI understanding us with little effort, will we stop trying to ask good questions that explore different angles? Will most people care enough to challenge the AI, or will we just accept whatever answer comes first because it's easier?
Give Vroni a GitHub issue, bug report, spec, or rough idea. It reads the repo, plans the change, writes code, runs checks, and works toward a review-ready pull request.
Take a look at vroni.com