I Tried to Make AI Writing Sound Human by Banning AI Words Through logit_bias
I tried to make AI writing sound more human with logit_bias, an API setting that changes how likely a model is to…
Consider this analogy: If a history book written in 2000 is to remain relevant in 2023, it either needs new chapters added or a complete rewrite. Similarly, large language models need either fine-tuning (adding new chapters) or retraining (complete rewrite) to remain current.
ChatGPT: Is OpenAI silently fine-tuning their model?
While ChatGPT often cites a 2022 knowledge cutoff, some users have noticed information from 2023 seeping in.
Is OpenAI silently fine-tuning their model?
I do think so. Fine-tuning is the economical choice to add new information. But a fine-tuned model is biased towards its original data. So while the model might know of events from 2023, its core understanding would still reflect the worldview of 2022.
The outcome isn't that great. If you ask ChatGPT to write code in a modern version of a framework it seems to know about some of the new stuff but that will be just mixed in with the old syntax.
So OpenAI doesn't advertise the fine-tuned model as a model with a new cut-off date, because it's not the same as a retrained model with a new cut-off date.
Give Vroni a GitHub issue, bug report, spec, or rough idea. It reads the repo, plans the change, writes code, runs checks, and works toward a review-ready pull request.
Take a look at vroni.com